Legal Opinion

Glass v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 21, 2000No. 92-428CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This action was originally filed June 25, 1992, and is one of what have come to be known as the Winstar-Related, Cases. Following the decision of the Supreme Court, in United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 870, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996), that the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIR-REA), Pub.L. No. 101-73,103 Stat. 183, codified, in relevant part, at 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (1990), constituted an implicit breach of contract, Chief Judge Loren A. Smith granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs on the issue of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Bowen v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API