Legal Opinion

State v. Ling

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

— Upon the trial, certain bottles containing liquor claimed by the State to be intoxicating, and to have been found in the possession of the defendant in his automobile, were introduced in evidence. Error is assigned on the refusal of the court to allow appellant to call members oi the jury and examine them "in support of his motion for a new trial, on his offer to show by them that certain of the bottles of liquor so found and introduced in evidence were taken to the jury room by ‘the sheriff, without authority and without the knowledge of the defendant, and that members of the jury examined…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Close v. SammSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Barker v. Town of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Morrison v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. James Phillip MorganCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  2. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. State v. EgglestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Post v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API