Legal Opinion

State v. Eggleston

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilioN, J.

I. Appellant complains that the trial court asked questions of witnesses produced by the State.

A witness had testified that he purchased liquor of the defendant; that he drank it, and in about fifteen minutes was dizzy and numb, and couldn’t handle his hands and 'feet, and was si°k- -After some further testimony which does not aPPear bn the record, the court said: “Just a moment. Either side may make any objections they care to. There is a matter the court does not understand about this drink,—did you see whatever liquid you drank before you drank it?”

The answer was, “Yes.” The court then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Rounds v. AleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. State v. LingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. State v. SpiersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hackman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. State v. HealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. State v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. State v. FerroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API