Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Muff v. Wollenberg, 08-Ca-11 (9-17-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2008No. 08-CA-11PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Relator has filed a Complaint for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus compelling Respondent to file a criminal complaint prepared by Relator. Respondent has filed a Motion to Dismiss to which Relator has filed a reply in opposition.
{¶ 2} Relator presented a criminal complaint to Respondent against Joseph A. Flautt for Tampering with Evidence, a felony of the third degree. Attached to the Complaint is an affidavit signed by Relator which appears to purport to be filed in compliance with R.C. 2935.09 and2935.10.
{¶ 3} To be entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, relator must…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Dominguez v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HansonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PendletonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dew v. VivoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Dixon v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020