Legal Opinion

Newcomer v. Weyerhaeuser Company

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 28, 1980No. 8133-1-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

—Geraldine C. Newcomer appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict. Weyerhaeuser cross-appeals from the denial of a motion for remittitur for excessive damages.

Issues

1. Where a jury returns a defective verdict which is sent back for reconsideration, may its deliberation be restricted to considering only one portion of the verdict, or does the entire verdict remain under the jury's control?

2. Should a motion for remittitur be granted where there is no evidence to support the jury's damage award?

Facts

Gary Newcomer was severely and permanently injured on June 8, 1973, when he fell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. James v. RobeckWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. Adams v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bino v. VeenhuizenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Beglinger v. ShieldWashington Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Flightcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Robinson v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Eggett v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  4. State v. PockertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API