Legal Opinion
Hinton v. Conner
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 5, 2005No. 1:04CV00004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel discovery of all “technical review” documents for disciplinary actions taken by defendant City of Durham (“City”) against its employees from January 1,1999 to present. Defendant opposes the motion, claiming the discovery request is unduly burdensome and will not reasonably lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Plaintiff has brought a civil rights action against the City of Durham and, more specifically, against the Department of Housing and Community Development. This action arose because of her being…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Patricia Peele v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Jack K. MOORE, Appellee, v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NC, Appellant, and Charlotte Police Department, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Curtiss L. Cook v. Csx Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartley v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Holtz v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.)District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005