Legal Opinion
Hartley v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 2016No. S-15-976PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/30/2016 08:09 AM CDT - 870 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports HARTLEY v. METROPOLITAN UTIL. DIST. Cite as
294 Neb. 870
K ristina J. H artley, appellee, v. Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed September 30, 2016. No. S-15-976. 1. Directed Verdict: Evidence. A directed verdict is proper only when reasonable minds cannot differ and can draw but one conclusion from the evidence, that is, when an issue should be decided as a matter of law. 2. Directed Verdict:…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bobbette Blake v. MJ OpticalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- O'Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Armstrong v. Clarkson CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Knapp v. RuserNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Mock v. NeumeisterNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.