Legal Opinion

McCormack v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1974No. 434-72PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

The plaintiff, a Veterans Preference Eligible and an Air Traffic Control Specialist (hereinafter referred to as “ATCS”) with the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as “FAA”), brings this action for improper separation to recover judgment in the amount of $35,988, plus interest thereon and costs, or, alternatively, reinstatement with back pay, including pay increases with interest thereon and costs plus attorneys’ fees. Further, the plaintiff requests an order vacating his previous classification as a “Key” federal employee with an express recommendation for reinstatement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Patrick F. X. McGucken v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Pettit v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Shubinsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Ainsworth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Bridgett L. Burgess v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Gratehouse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Charles Clark v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API