Talbot v. Mattox, Dawson & Posey Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Jackson County Court; W. T. McConnell, Judge. Action by the Mattox, Dawson & Posey Realty Company against J. W. Talbot and others; Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Citing: Fitzgerald v. Hcuuson (Mont.) 41 Pac. 230; Ergison v. Gooch» 40 L. R. A. 237; Wychof v. Taylor, 13 Daly (N. Y.) 569; 19 Cyc. 278; 22 Enc. PI. & Pr. 552.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
It is alleged in plaintiff’s petition (defendant. in error) that the defendant (plaintiff in error) Talbot employed the plaintiffs to sell the aforesaid land, and expressly agreed that they should be the only agents appointed to sell the said land, and that their compensation should be what difference they could get over and above the sum of $2,000. The answer of the defendant is in part as follows:
“(3)) He denies that he ever made a contract with the said plaintiffs employing them as his exclusive agents to sell said land. (4) He denies that ho ever employed said plaintiffs to sell said land…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Savage v. Salem Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Marlatt v. Clary & LatimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanders v. C. P. Carter Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Neal Gin Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- New York Life Ins. v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Kernaghan & Cordill v. UthoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Moore v. CraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.