Legal Opinion

Fernau v. Rowdon

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2002No. S-9142PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETIL Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Elizabeth Rowdon and Walter Fernau had three children. After Elizabeth filed for divorce, the parties agreed to a hybrid divided custody situation, but disputed child support and rehabilitative alimony. Because Walter worked in a well-paying career in medicine while Elizabeth stayed home to care for the children, the trial court awarded Elizabeth increased child support under Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 90.3(c), rehabilitative alimony, and partial attorney's fees. Walter appeals these awards. Because they are justified by the circumstances of this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ebertz v. EbertzAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Barnett v. BarnettAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Cartee v. CarteeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hopper v. HopperAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Carr v. CarrAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API