Legal Opinion
Carr v. Carr
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 2007No. S-11598PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Soon after Kelly and Connie Carr separated in 2004, Kelly was indicted for sexually abusing minors and possessing child pornog: raphy. Connie then filed for divorcee. With Kelly's consent, Superior Court Judge Eric Smith presided over both the divorce and the criminal cases. After a jury convicted Kelly in the criminal case, Judge Smith held a trial on disputed property issues in the divorce; Kelly participated telephonically from the jail. The court ruled against Kelly on most points in dispute. Kelly later moved to set aside the property order,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- In Interest of FHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Long v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Lacher v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Alyssa B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.