Legal Opinion

Babst v. Hartz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 1, 1926No. 27653PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Padr, J.

-On October 16, 1922, Thomas W. Hooley was the owner of the premises No. 4826 Pitt street, between Upperline and Bordeaux streets, Prytania street in the rear, measuring 75 feet front on Pitt street by 100 feet in depth.

On that day he leased said premises to Julius Hartz, one of the defendants, until November 30, 1923, at $50 per month. And on September 20, 1923, he sold said premises to plaintiff.

At the expiration of the lease Julius Ha'rtz, the tenant, refused to renew, but he did not vacate the premises, as negotiations were then pending between the parties looking toward a sale of part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roussel v. DalcheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Jones v. BouanchaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Cepro v. MatulichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Hodgson v. RothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  5. Gillaspie v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sutton v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Central Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Oilfield Supply & Scrap Material Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Davies v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Wooten v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Central Sav. B. T. Co. v. Oil Field Supply S. Mat.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API