Legal Opinion

Central Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Oilfield Supply & Scrap Material Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 8, 1943No. 36811PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The holder and owner of a certain promissory negotiable chattel mortgage note instituted suit against the endorsers in due course, for value thereof, in solido.

The defense is that the holder of the note, knowingly and through “extreme negligence” permitted the mortgaged chattel to be sold under a subordinate lessor’s claim and lien and intentionally did not intervene in the suit by the lessor against the maker of the note, and deliberately refrained from notifying the defendants of the seizure, thereby depriving them of an opportunity to preserve the collateral security, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bonart v. RabitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Stanley v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Youree v. LimerickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Canal Bank & Trust Co. v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Spies v. . National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Davies v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Glass v. McLendonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Saunier v. SaunierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. American Security Bank of Ville Platte, Inc. v. VidrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API