Gillaspie v. Scott
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Fifth Judicial District Court, parish of Richland-Richardson, J. First — \Injunctions without bond must be confined to the causes only set forth in C. P. 739. Second — If any other cause is alleged, there must be bond and security., or the averments will be disregarded, or the injunction dissolved, at. the option of Defendant.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Fifth Judicial District Court, parish of Richland-Richardson, J. First — \Injunctions without bond must be confined to the causes only set forth in C. P. 739. Second — If any other cause is alleged, there must be bond and security., or the averments will be disregarded, or the injunction dissolved, at. the option of Defendant. Third — Reconventional demands are not permissible under Art. C. P. 739L Fourth — Issues already adjudged between the parties should not be allowed to be plead under this article. Fifth — When it is evident that the injunction under 739 is for no just…
1Opinion of the Court
On Motioit to Dismiss.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Bermudez, C. J.
The plaintiff and appellee moves to dismiss this ■appeal on the grounds:(a). That the certificate of the clerk is not at its proper place in the transcript and is not full;(b). That the transcript is incorrect and incomplete ;(o). That matters and documents are incorporated in the transcript which do not belong to it;(d). That a transcript belonging to this Court was, without leave, so incorporated.(a). We find the clerk’s certificate properly at foot of the transcript prepared by him in this case, and which covers…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Babst v. HartzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Wright v. Gorman-Wright Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1907
- Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. ShafferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Jones v. BouanchaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924