Legal Opinion
McGraw-Edison Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1976No. 646, 647 (1974)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The question before the circuit court and now before this court upon appeal is whether DILHR misconstrued the unemployment compensation statutes so as to grant unemployment compensation benefits to employees who have received lump-sum retirement benefits from a retirement fund provided for, in the main, by the employer.
Paul K. Smith and Donald Kunde were longtime employees of MeGraw-Edison. On December 31, 1970, and May 31, 1972, respectively, they retired, having reached the employer’s compulsory retirement age of sixty-five. Both had participated in the employer’s profit sharing plan, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of School Directors v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Cheese v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- McGraw-Edison Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Fish v. White Equipment Sales & Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. LampingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Redin v. Empire Oldsmobile, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- La Crosse Footwear, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- In Matter of Guardianship & Protective Placement of ShawCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- City of Milwaukee v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Lincoln National Bank v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.