Legal Opinion
Fujitsu Limited v. Netgear Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 20, 2010No. 2010-1045PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
U.S. Philips Corporation (Philips), Fujitsu Limited (Fujitsu), and LG Electronics, Inc. (LG) appeal from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. The district court, on summary judgment, held that the Defendant, Netgear Inc. (Netgear) did not infringe any of the asserted claims. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand.
Background
Each appellant in this case asserted claims against Netgear. Philips asserted claims of U.S. patent no. 4,975,952 ('952 patent). Fujitsu asserted claims from U.S.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Pecorino v. Vutec Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.