Legal Opinion
Pecorino v. Vutec Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 30, 2012No. 11-CV-6312 (ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs Philip A. Pecorino, Aldo Medaglia, and Sheward & Son & Sons, d/b/a Visionart (“Visionart”) commenced this action for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,264,765 (“the '765 Patent”) under the patent laws of the United *428States, 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. Presently before the Court are two motions filed by the Defendants to transfer venue to the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and/or to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dickerson v. Novartis Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Sarvint Technologies, Inc. v. OMsignal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Ward v. StewartDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Marposs Societá per Azioni v. Jenoptik Automotive North America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.