Legal Opinion
Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 11, 2012No. 2011-1204PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Toshiba Corporation accused Imation Corporation et al. (collectively, Appellees) of infringing claims of U.S. Patent nos. 5,892,751 ('751 patent) and 5,831,966 ('966 patent) relating to optical disc technology. The district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement for the asserted claims under both patents except for a de minimis claim of direct infringement that was later dismissed. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm-in-part…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Novel Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Astrazeneca Ab v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.