Legal Opinion

Correll v. Boulware

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 8410SC695PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Petitioner has excepted to several of the Board’s findings of fact. He contends that these findings are not supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record, and are arbitrary and capricious.

In reviewing the sufficiency of a board’s findings of fact, the reviewing court must examine the “whole record” to determine if there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s findings. Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). Substantial evidence to support a finding is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. BounousCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John v. RobbinsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API