Legal Opinion

Davis v. Jennings

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 20, 1991No. 23404PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

The Charlotte Observer (Newspaper) appeals an Order denying its motion to intervene in an action between C.G. Davis, et al, and Doyle Jennings, et al, (Respondents).

We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondents were parties to a Common Pleas action involving sale of property in York County. The dispute was settled and, on December 29,1989, the trial court entered orders dismissing the case with prejudice and sealing the record.

On January 25, 1990, Newspaper’s motion to intervene in order to object to the sealing of the record was denied.

ISSUES

1. Was Newspaper entitled to intervenor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. FenstermakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. C.L. v. EdsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control v. Columbia Organic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Ex Parte ReichlynSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Ex Parte Greenville News.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API