C.L. v. Edson
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
In this appeal, the original plaintiffs and defendants in a civil suit (original parties) join together to oppose a postjudgment intervention action by the Eau Claire Leader-Telegram. The original parties challenge the newspaper’s entitlement to intervene, the timeliness of the newspaper’s intervention, and the trial court’s order allowing public disclosure of sealed settlement documents. Because the postjudgment intervention was timely and did not prejudice the original parties and because the circuit court properly ordered edited versions of the records disclosed, we affirm.
C.L. and five…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hathaway v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Bilder v. Township of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Glinski v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Shenandoah Publishing House, Inc. v. FanningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Davis v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, Inc. v. ErpenbachCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.