Miller v. Moylan
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This action, by a real estate broker against an owner who employed him to sell certain property, was tried before the judge without a jury and the judge entered a judgment against the owner for the amount of the commission claimed. The owner is now appellant; the broker, appellee.
The commission for appellee’s services was to be paid for securing a purchaser upon the terms specified in the “Exclusive Listing.” The appellee found a purchaser who entered into an agreement with the owner to buy upon the stipulated terms subject to the condition, however, “that this property be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knowles v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Hart v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Langford v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Seminole Fruit & Land Co. v. ROSBOROUGH-WEINERSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hanover Realty Corp. v. CodomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Richardson v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Sugarland Real Estate, Inc. v. BeardsleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Keyes Co. v. Florida Nursing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Hurt v. KitroserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.