Legal Opinion

Miller v. Moylan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 7, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

This action, by a real estate broker against an owner who employed him to sell certain property, was tried before the judge without a jury and the judge entered a judgment against the owner for the amount of the commission claimed. The owner is now appellant; the broker, appellee.

The commission for appellee’s services was to be paid for securing a purchaser upon the terms specified in the “Exclusive Listing.” The appellee found a purchaser who entered into an agreement with the owner to buy upon the stipulated terms subject to the condition, however, “that this property be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knowles v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  2. Hart v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Langford v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Seminole Fruit & Land Co. v. ROSBOROUGH-WEINERSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanover Realty Corp. v. CodomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Richardson v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  3. Sugarland Real Estate, Inc. v. BeardsleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Keyes Co. v. Florida Nursing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Hurt v. KitroserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API