Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Astrue
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 2012No. 11 Civ. 3323 (NRB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Emily Ortiz brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner *253of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) to deny her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), and plaintiff has submitted a brief in opposition to this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND1
Plaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Zabala v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Norman v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Gallagher v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Beard v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
- Chuderski v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019
- Hersey v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.