Legal Opinion
Hotel Employees, Restaurant Employees Union, Local 2 v. Marriott Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1992No. Nos. 90-15023, 90-15571PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
The San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) is charged with finding private developers • for certain publicly owned properties. In late 1980, the Agency solicited proposals for the development of a major luxury hotel. At public hearings, Hotel Employees, Restaurant Employees Union, Local 2 (Local 2), which considers the Marriott Corporation (Marriott) an anti-union employer, urged the Agency not to award Marriott the project.
After a series of meetings, Local 2 and Marriott reached an agreement confirmed in a letter from Gary Wilson, Marriott’s Senior…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Unions Nos. 128 & 633 v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Small v. AVANTI HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 57 v. Sage Hospitality Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Dignity Health v. Seare (In re Seare)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union Local 217 v. J.P. Morgan HotelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Pace v. Honolulu Disposal Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.