Legal Opinion
NOLASCO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3385PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3385 In re Sergio NOLASCO-Tofino, Respondent File A74 985 878 - New York Decided April 15, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals For purposes of determining eligibility for suspension of deportation, the period of con- tinuous physical presence ends at the service of the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing (Form I-221) on the alien, irrespective of the date that it was issued. James J. Kelly, Esquire, Brooklyn, New York, for respondent Thomas P. McGrath, Assistant District Counsel, for the Immigration and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Francisco Alcaraz Leticia Cardenas Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Melquiades T. Lagandaon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- JURADOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- ORTEGA-CABRERABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005
- MENDOZA-SANDINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.