Legal Opinion

Francisco Alcaraz Leticia Cardenas Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 2004No. 01-71171PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners Francisco and Leticia Alcar-az petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that affirmed a decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) who ordered their removal and denied their application for suspension of deportation. The Alcarazes were statutorily eligible for suspension of deportation at the time they submitted their application. But before the date their applications were to be heard on the merits, Congress enacted the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”). Section 309 of that Act…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Jose J. Padilla-Padilla Guadalupe D. Padilla-Enriquez Adela Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. JG v. Douglas County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API