Hoskin v. Resor
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GASCH, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on cross motions for summary judgment. It has been thoroughly briefed, extensive exhibits were filed, and counsel have been heard in open Court. The Court agrees that there is no issue of material fact and concludes that plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. This suit raises the issue of whether the members of the Russian Railway Service Corps were members of the Army of the United States during World War I and whether as such they are entitled to an Honorable Discharge therefrom.
The Court takes…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Harmon v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Devine v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Devine v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Raymond E. Robinson v. Stanley R. ResorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Schumacher v. AldridgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987