Legal Opinion

Vilis Martins Lapenieks v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1968No. 21199_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

389 F.2d 343

Vilis Martins LAPENIEKS, Appellant,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Department of Justice, etc., Appellee.

No. 21199.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 11, 1968.

1

Edgar F. Gross (argued), of Gross & Eisenstein and Richard B. Cutler, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

2

James R. Dooley, Asst. U. S. Atty., (argued), William H. Karp, General Atty., William M. Bryne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief of Civil Division, Los Angeles, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, San Pedro, Cal., for appellee.

3

Before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ceballos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Otto Klaus Gunther HoellgerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Mangaoang v. Boyd, Districtor Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. In the Matter of the Petition of Jose Dominguez Rego for Naturalization. Jose Dominguez RegoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  5. Garrett Aiden Cannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API