Legal Opinion

Garrett Aiden Cannon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 27, 1961No. 26051_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to interpret Section 315(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1426(a) (effective December 24, 1952), a section interpreted by the Supreme Court in Ceballos v. Shaughnessy, 1957, 352 U.S. 599, 77 S.Ct. 545, 1 L.Ed.2d 583, and exhaustively considered by this court in United States v. Hoellger, 2 Cir., 1960, 273 F.2d 760.

The section reads as follows:

“(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(b) of this Act, any alien who applies or has applied for exemption or discharge from training or service in the Armed Forces…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ceballos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Otto Klaus Gunther HoellgerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerhard Willi August LacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Vilis Martins Lapenieks v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. In re Petition for Naturalization of KadichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Davar Products, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. In re Petition for Naturalization of ThannerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API