Harris v. State

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant, Cecil Ray Harris, pleaded not guilty to possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, of less than one gram. A jury subsequently found Appellant guilty, and the trial court sentenced him to eighteen months’ confinement. In three points, Appellant argues that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient and that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

Legal and Factual Sufficiency

In his first two points, Appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction.

In…