Hebert v. State

OPINION

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

Appellant challenges his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He asserts his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence and claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial and in admitting irrelevant evidence. Appellant also asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his conviction and sentence violate his rights under the Texas Constitution. We affirm.

I. Factual and PeoceduRal Background

Officer Stephen Frank was patrolling when he saw appellant speeding. Officer Frank pulled his vehicle behind…