Tupper v. Kroc
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Batjer, J.:
These two cases were consolidated for the purpose of appeal because the same legal issues are involved in each.
Lloyd G. Tupper, appellant, and Ray A. Kroc, respondent, entered into three limited partnerships for the purpose of holding title to and leasing parcels of real estate. Tupper was the general partner, Kroc was the limited partner and each held a fifty percent interest.
Kroc filed an action alleging that Tupper had mismanaged and misappropriated funds from these partnerships and requested that they be dissolved and that a receiver be appointed. Pending…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
- McMillan v. United Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Hopping v. HoppingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Douglas Spencer and Associates v. Las Vegas Sun, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Dermody v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Bohonus v. AmercoArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Nigri v. LotzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Gates Rubber Co. v. WillifordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.