State v. Casada
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
After a jury found Orval Casada guilty of failure to register as a sex offender, 1 a Class D felony, the trial court found sug sponte "the State of Indiana has failed.to allege and prove the Defendant knowingly or intentionally violated the relevant registration statute." (App. at 81.) The court then éntered a judgment of acquittal, from which the State appeals.
We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ©
Casada was convicted of child molesting as a Class C felony and was placed on probation after he was released from prison.: One of the conditions of his probation was that he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Lampitok v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.