Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Harris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 9, 2003No. 2003-B-0212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1186ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

1,PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Ray Charles Harris, a currently suspended attorney.

FORMAL CHARGES

On November 13, 2000, this court sus the practice of law for a period of eighteen months. In re: Harris, 00-1825 (La.11/13/00), 774 So.2d 963 (“Harris I”). The formal charges in Harris I stemmed from respondent’s representation of his client, Robert Haynes, in a criminal case. After Mr. Haynes was convicted, he retained respondent to represent him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re RaspantiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. In Re HollidaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  3. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. In Re: William MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
  5. In re NorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API