Legal Opinion

People v. Hartman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 5, 1987No. 86SA399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

In this disciplinary proceeding, it was alleged that Cecil A. Hartman, a member of the bar of the Supreme Court, State of Colorado, since 1949, had been suspended from practice before the United States Tax Court for filing frivolous pleadings and failing to report the suspension to the Colorado Supreme Court Grievance Committee. Based upon stipulated facts, a hearing board of the Grievance Committee recommended that respondent be suspended from practice for six months. The hearing panel concurred, and so do we. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. FosterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API