United States v. Gordon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
After five years of reflection, Jeffrey Paul Gordon has reconsidered the wisdom of his pressing his claims of innocence upon the jury that convicted him. Specifically, Gordon now finds constitutional fault in his trial counsel’s failure to urge upon him a non-trial disposition of his case.
Because Gordon’s contention is, as far as we can tell, unprecedented in this or any other Circuit, we will address it at some length.
Background
On July 1, 1992, a grand jury returned an indictment against Gordon, a pharmacist. Gordon was charged with two counts of possession…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Andre Stanley Deputy v. Stanley Taylor, Warden, Sussex Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. McGillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- United States v. RosendaryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- McCoy v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- CANNON v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- CANNON v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.