United States v. McGill
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant McGill’s motion to plead nolo contendere or make an Alford plea as to Count One of the indictment charging conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1349. For the reasons that follow, the Court will reject the proffer of such plea.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 21, 2012, Defendant Patricia McGill was charged by indictment with conspiring to commit healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One) and substantive counts of healthcare fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (Counts Two through Fourteen) in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Begnoche v. ThompsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Begnoche v. ThompsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Begnoche v. ThompsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. SHRI GANESAI LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- United States v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019