Legal Opinion

Cayard v. Robertson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox .County. Hu L. M’Clung, Chancellor.'

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beard

The complainants, in part as owners and in part as lienors, are interested in a judgment for $5000, rendered against Robertson & Hobbs for a fatal injury received by an employee while in their service, as a result of their actionable negligence. This judgment has not been paid, and, on account of the insolvency of the judgment debtors, cannot be collected out of them. At the time of the injury Robertson & Hobbs were carrying an employer’s indemnity policy, issued to them by the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, which covered the injury that constituted the original cause of action, to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  3. Finley v. United States Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Allen v. Gilman, McNeil & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Combs v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Ford v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Associated Indemnity Corp. of San Francisco v. McAlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. Bowling Green Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API