Legal Opinion

Finley v. United States Casualty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1904PublishedCited by 35 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The plaintiff was formerly an employee in the factory of one E. F. Smith, then doing business under the name of the Johnson City Veneer Mills. He was injured in the mill, and thereupon brought suit against Smith, and recovered judgment for f1,000 damages; it having been alleged that the injury was caused by the negligence of Smith. Prior to this time, Smith had obtained a policy of indemnity in the defendant company. Pending the action above mentioned, Smith proposed to- accept $50 from the company in full compromise and settlement of his claim under the policy. He had failed to give notice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Locke v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Rector, Etc., of Trinity Church v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Anoka Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  5. Fenton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Neff v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Kinnan v. Charles B. Hurst Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Combs v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API