Legal Opinion
Omar v. Harvey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2007No. Civ. A. 05-2374 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Without Prejudice the Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for Access; Granting the Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for Medical Records and Photographs
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The instant motion requests that the court consider the appropriate response to an allegation of government torture of a prisoner. The petitioner’s 1 attorney moves the court to order the government to grant him effective access to his client by transporting his client to a detention facility within the United States. 2 Pet’r’s Reply at 2. He also requests that the government…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Husayn v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- AL-OSHAN v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Mohamed v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Al-Oshan v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Mohamed v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009