Legal Opinion

City of Fairbanks v. Alaska Public Utilities Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1980No. 3977PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The City of Fairbanks appeals from a decision of the superior court affirming an order of the Alaska Public Utilities Commission which denied Fairbanks a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide telephone service to the Fort Wainwright Military Reservation, and awarded the certificate to Wire Communications, Inc. (Wirecom) d/b/a Great Land Telephone.

Multiple claims of error are presented. With one exception, we agree with the well reasoned opinion of the superior court. The point on which we differ relates to the Commission’s treatment of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Olson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Department of Corrections v. KrausAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API