Legal Opinion
State v. Sandfer
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 10, 1951No. A-11316PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The defendant in error, C. F. Sandier, was charged by information filed in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with the violation of sections 965 and 970, Title 21 O.S.A., the said information, omitting, caption and signature, reading:
“That Elmer W. Adams, the duly qualified and acting County Attorney for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, who prosecutes in the name and by authority of the State of Oklahoma, comes now into Court of Common Pleas within and for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, on this the 19th day of July, A.D. 1949, and gives the Court to understand and be informed that on the 19th…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Couch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Barlow v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Traxler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Woods Petroleum Corp. v. Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Haynes v. CaporalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.