Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Caporal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 1977No. 49667PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice:
In 1973, the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC Board) amended Art. 3, § 5E(3) of its Rules and Regulations. 1 This amendment allowed a wholesaler to collect a “bottle handling charge” 2 in filling a fractional case order from a retailer.
Here, two retailers 3 (retailers) brought suit seeking damages and injunctive relief against four wholesalers 4 (wholesalers) for collecting this charge on sales to these retailers under the amended rule. Trial court gave judgment to the retailers. Judgment allowed retailers to recover the actual bottle handling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Barlow v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Independent Bankers Ass'n of Georgia, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Davis v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State v. SandferCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Whitely v. New Mexico State Personnel BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- United States Brewers Ass'n v. Director of the New Mexico Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.