Legal Opinion
Hess v. Department of Juvenile Services
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 31, 2008No. 2025, 2043, Sept. Term, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtThieme, J.
This is the second appeal to this Court by Samuel Hess, Edward Martin, David Weimer, and Samuel Harmon from a decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), 1 rejecting their claim that they are entitled to compensation for the time they are required to spend “on call” in their employment as Juvenile Transportation Officers (“JTOs”) with the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services. The case was remanded by this Court in an unreported opinion by Judge Mary Ellen Barbera (since elevated to the Court of Appeals), filed on August 9, 2006. 2 We shall restate portions of that opinion where…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Owens v. Local No. 169, Ass'n of Western Pulp & Paper WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Frederick George Bright v. Houston Northwest Medical Center Survivor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clayton v. Delmarva Community Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020