Legal Opinion

Plumer v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1958No. L. A. 24880PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner seeks annulment of an order of the respondent court vacating the suspension of a sentence for contempt and ordering the sentence “into effect forthwith.” Said sentence had been imposed upon petitioner for his failure to make certain payments for the support of his former wife and his child as provided in the spouses’ agreement and decree of divorce. He contends that enforcement of his obligations thereunder through contempt proceedings constitutes a violation of the constitutional prohibition against imprisonment for debt. (Cal. Const., art. I, §15.) Our review of the record leads…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Plumer v. PlumerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Streeter v. StreeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API