Legal Opinion
Hart Twin Volvo Corporation v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 23, 1973PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
This is an appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles in finding that the plaintiff violated § 14-51 of the General Statutes regarding the qualifications of a new car dealer and in finding that the plaintiff violated § 14-63-2 (f) of the regulations of the Connecticut motor vehicle department in not having sufficient personnel and equipment to service a customer’s car. The commissioner, pursuant to § 14-64, suspended the plaintiff’s license for five days for each violation, to run consecutively. From this decision the plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Jutkowitz v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.