General Motors Truck Co. v. Kenwood Tire Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKime, J.
The appellee had sold two truck tires to one Cornett under a conditional-sales contract retaining title to itself until full payment had been made therefor. These tires were placed upon a truck the appellant had sold to Cornett under a conditional-sales contract retaining title in itself, which contract contained the further provisions that “the seller may, without demand or notice (demand and notice being hereby waived) take immediate possession of all said goods or any part thereof, including any equipment, additions or accessories thereto, and the seller, its agents, attorneys and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Blackwood Tire & Vulcanizing Co. v. Auto Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Clarke v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1920
- Motor Credit Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- D. Q. Service Corp. v. Securities Loan & Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. CaesarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. Pratt Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Ivey's Inc. v. Southern Auto StoresCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Meisel Tire Co. v. Edwards Finance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. F. M. Rugg Motor Sales Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939