Legal Opinion

Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. F. M. Rugg Motor Sales Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, P. J.

In 1936, appellee, the F. M. Rugg Motor Sales Company, sold an automobile to one Goltrie. Contemporaneous therewith Goltrie executed and delivered to appellee a chattel mortgage to secure a portion of the purchase price. The mortgage was promptly filed for record. Goltrie was given possession of the car. The mortgage speaks no word concerning subsequent accéssions to the car, if that fact is of importance, which we think it is not.

Thereafter, in 1937, at the request of the mortgagor, appellant sold Goltrie four tires. This contract of sale was a conditional retain-title one. It was promptly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
  3. Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Clarke v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Motor Credit Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API