Legal Opinion

McCleery v. McCleery-Dudley Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 6, 1926No. 26,463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The question presented here is whether the statutory trustees of a defunct corporation (R. S. 17-808) may prosecute an action on behalf of its stockholders’ and creditors where a receiver has been regularly appointed and has charge of its affairs under direction of the court.

To plaintiffs’ petition the defendants filed a motion to dismiss as on a plea in abatement (R. S. 60-2902). The motion was sustained, and plaintiffs appeal.

The court found:

“That the cause of action, set forth in the petition filed in this case is vested in the receiver…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spena v. GoffeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Four-S Razor Co. v. GuymonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Ruckel v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. McCleery v. DudleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCleery v. McCleery Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Bertholf v. CornelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. McCleery v. McCleery Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API