Ruckel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
Plaintiff brought this action to subject the proceeds of a life insurance policy to the satisfaction of the debts of a bankrupt corporation which had originally been designated as beneficiary by the insured who was its president and business manager.
The facts were these: In 1918, Walter S. Herr was president and manager of the Murray Extract Company, a Wichita business corporation. He applied for and received from the defendant a $5,000 policy of life insurance, naming the corporation as his beneficiary, and the policy provided that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burlingham v. CrouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gochenour v. George & Francis Ball FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1941
- Mutual Trust Life Insurance Company v. WemyssDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1970
- Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. ScalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Wolensky's L.P. (In Re Wolensky's Ltd. Partnership)District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Curtis v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.