Legal Opinion

Ruckel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1925No. 26,150PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

Plaintiff brought this action to subject the proceeds of a life insurance policy to the satisfaction of the debts of a bankrupt corporation which had originally been designated as beneficiary by the insured who was its president and business manager.

The facts were these: In 1918, Walter S. Herr was president and manager of the Murray Extract Company, a Wichita business corporation. He applied for and received from the defendant a $5,000 policy of life insurance, naming the corporation as his beneficiary, and the policy provided that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burlingham v. CrouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gochenour v. George & Francis Ball FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1941
  2. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Company v. WemyssDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1970
  3. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. ScalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Wolensky's L.P. (In Re Wolensky's Ltd. Partnership)District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  5. Curtis v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API